The existence of God has been a subject of debate for so many years. It has challenged the brilliant minds of many philosophers and the religious to explain whether or not God does exist through priori reasoning and empirical observation. Same with another debatable subject which is creationism and evolution, the ontological argument for God aims to discover and answer questions that pertain to reality.
The ontological argument for God is indeed an intriguing subject to be discussed thus several different versions of the argument has been given to explain that God exists. In so many ways, the ontological argument for God can answer why people need religion. The existence of a supreme being has been common in almost all major religions all over the world and the laws and codes of every religion act as a guide for people. St. Anselm’s argument for the existence of God was the first argument that has been widely accepted stating that God exists in the understanding. Other versions from famous thinkers such as Descartes’ ontological argument, Gottfried Leibniz, Norman Malcolm and Mulla Sadra among others have emerged as well. The ontological argument for God attracted many thinkers to criticize and object to the posed arguments such as Gaunilo of Marmoutiers, St. Thomas Aquinas, Immanuel Kant, David Hume and Douglas Gasking.
All these thinkers do offer useful and significant insights to the ontological argument for God which is a great topic for a comparison essay. While each argument proves and disproves the existence of God, it is certainly different for every individual who believes and has faith. The ontological argument for God as presented by some of the famous thinkers has been deduced by thinking that God does exist which is most likely how some thought despite not being famous philosophers, they think that God exists and they believe it.